Scout Community UX concept sketch

Automotive UX is at a turning point—either continue chasing screen-heavy minimalism or embrace a smarter balance of digital and physical controls. At CES 2025, Scout Motors introduced Community UX, a bold challenge to the screen-dominated UX trend, blending digital innovation with the proven intuitiveness of physical controls. In an era where automotive interiors have increasingly trended toward screen-dominated, minimalist designs—often at the expense of usability—Scout is carving out a new, more human-centered approach.

VW is reviving the long-dormant Scout nameplate with the upcoming Traveler SUV and Terra truck, all-electric models set to launch in late 2027. These vehicles blend off-road heritage with modern technology, offering both pure EV and extended-range gas/EV options. With rugged, adventure-ready designs, Scout aims to balance classic utility with future-focused innovation.

More Than a Name: The Meaning Behind ‘Community UX’

“We listened to our customers and created an experience that’s intuitive, versatile, and uniquely Scout. Our Community UX is grounded, warm, and approachable, yet it’s innovative and modern, offering everything drivers need without overwhelming their experience,” says Chris Benjamin, Scout Motors Chief Design Officer.

Community UX isn’t just a name; it’s a statement of intent. It’s built to reflect what makes Scout unique—vehicles that bring people together. The brand’s die-hard fans have always seen their Scouts as adventure tools for shared experiences, and this UX takes that ethos into the digital age.

Rather than just layering technology onto an interior, Scout’s designers have focused on making the cabin a social, inviting space. The balance of warmth, ruggedness, and modern tech is evident, with intuitive controls that feel tactile and natural rather than cold and impersonal. It’s a refreshing departure from the sterile, screen-first approach dominating many new EVs.

Scout’s approach stands apart by merging rugged heritage with modern UX, creating an interface that’s as intuitive as it is functional. Here’s how they’re making it work. 

Screen Size, Placement, and Orientation: Designed for Usability, Not Just Aesthetics

A 16.2-inch, 24:9 ultra-wide display is at the core of Scout’s interface, strategically positioned within the driver’s natural line of sight. Unlike some brands that treat in-car screens as oversized tablets slapped onto the dash, Scout has clearly thought through how a screen should function in motion, not just at a standstill.

  • Larger icons, clear layouts, and generous touch areas make it easier to interact with while driving.

  • Detox Mode helps reduce visual clutter, ensuring the driver isn’t overwhelmed with unnecessary data.

  • No Head-Up Display (HUD), but screen placement is designed to compensate.

The lack of a HUD may be a sticking point for some, but Scout’s argument is that proper screen positioning can eliminate the need. That’s a smart idea in theory—but whether it works in practice will depend on real-world ergonomics.

Physical Meets Digital: The Best of Both Worlds

Scout Motors is rejecting the false choice between button-free minimalism and overwhelming complexity, instead focusing on how physical and digital controls can complement one another.

  • Tactile buttons and knobs are retained for essential functions like HVAC and volume—where physical controls offer the best experience.

  • Swipe-down gestures bring up quick-access settings, blending the familiarity of a smartphone with automotive usability.

  • Role-swapping controls allow passengers to seamlessly take over tasks like navigation and media, reducing distraction for the driver.

  • A chronograph-inspired volume knob and a physical compass add mechanical, heritage-inspired touches that also serve a functional role.

This hybrid approach addresses a core failing of touchscreen-heavy interfaces: when everything is on a screen, it forces drivers to look away from the road. The physical act of turning a knob or flipping a switch provides instant feedback—no need to aim your finger at an unmarked section of glass while in motion.

The industry’s minimalist obsession, led by Tesla and echoed in many modern EVs, has often resulted in a loss of intuitive usability. Muscle memory plays a huge role in how we interact with controls, and the lack of edges, textures, or physical markers makes touchscreen-centric systems less user-friendly, not more. Scout’s approach isn’t just about nostalgia for physical buttons—it’s about preserving real-world usability while embracing digital adaptability.

Interior Design and Digital UX: Cohesion, Not Compromise

Scout’s approach to UX isn’t just about functionality—it’s about how digital interfaces harmonize with the cabin’s overall design.

  • A screen that integrates with the dashboard, rather than looking like an afterthought.

  • Ambient lighting as UI feedback, subtly shifting based on drive modes and conditions.

  • Off-road UI elements that dynamically prioritize terrain data, underbody cameras, and navigation tools when needed.

  • A modular interior designed for personalization and accessorization.

This kind of thoughtful integration is key. It acknowledges that digital interfaces shouldn’t feel separate from the physical design—they should feel like a natural extension of it. Many brands have struggled with this, either overloading interiors with buttons (as seen in some older Porsches and Rams) or stripping things down to the point of clinical sterility (Tesla’s approach). Scout is attempting to create a new middle ground, one where digital and physical design complement rather than compete.

​A Smarter Evolution of Automotive UX

Instead of chasing the extremes—either hyper-digital minimalism or button-heavy excess—Scout Motors is forging a new path that values both intuitive usability and modern technology.

What’s Smart About It:

  • ✅ A dashboard-integrated widescreen display, positioned for better visibility.
  • Physical buttons where they matter, ensuring quick, intuitive access to key functions.
  • Role-swapping controls that allow passengers to assist with navigation and media.
  • UI-adaptive lighting and off-road-focused interface enhancements.

What’s Still Unclear:

  • ❓ Will the swipe-to-transfer system be intuitive, or will accidental inputs frustrate users?
  • ❓ Does screen placement truly compensate for the lack of a HUD?
  • ❓ Will voice control be refined enough to be a real alternative to buttons?

Final Thought

Scout Motors is taking a forward-thinking but user-first approach to UX, ensuring physical and digital elements enhance each other. If executed well, Community UX could redefine how drivers interact with their vehicles.

Interestingly, Rivian’s upcoming R2 has also taken a step toward reintegrating physical controls with its new dynamic click-wheel system on the steering wheel. These haptic feedback-enabled controls allow drivers to interact with various features while keeping their hands on the wheel, representing a smart evolution in the physical-digital balance. While Rivian’s approach is focused on steering wheel interactions, Scout is taking a more holistic approach across the entire cabin.

Would you use this UX? Let’s discuss.